<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Supreme Court Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kscblog.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>News and analysis about the Kansas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='kscblog.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://kscblog.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Kansas Supreme Court Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: Moser v. KDoR</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/decision-moser-v-kdor/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/decision-moser-v-kdor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 28th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Moser v. Kansas Department of Revenue (No. 96,734) an appeal from a suspension of a driving license. In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Lee Johnson, the court held that an administrative appeal against a driving license suspension must be filed within 10 days [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=413&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/decision-moser-v-kdor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: Landmark National Bank v. Kesler</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/decision-landmark-national-bank-v-kesler/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/decision-landmark-national-bank-v-kesler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosen opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 28th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Landmark National Bank v. Kesler (No. 98,489), a complex foreclosure proceeding. In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Eric Rosen, the Court held that under the circumstances of this case the second-mortgage holder could not undo the foreclosure that had been performed and settled [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=411&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/decision-landmark-national-bank-v-kesler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: Philips v. St Paul Marine &amp; Fire</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/decision-philips-v-st-paul-marine-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/decision-philips-v-st-paul-marine-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beier opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 28th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its decision in Phillips v. St Paul Marine and Fire Insurance Company (No. 97,806), a coverage dispute. In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Carol Beier, the Court held that the plain wording of KSA 40-284(c) meant that the Wyandotte County Government&#8217;s opt out of certain coverage [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=409&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/decision-philips-v-st-paul-marine-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: State v. Leshay</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/decision-state-v-leshay/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/decision-state-v-leshay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 28th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its opinion in State v. Leshay (No. 99,725), an appeal of a dismissal of drug charges in District Court. In a unanimous decision, written by Justice Lee Johnson, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment Right to Confront one&#8217;s accusers does not apply at a Preliminary Hearing [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=407&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/decision-state-v-leshay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: State v. Trussell</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/decision-state-v-trussell/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/decision-state-v-trussell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 21. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its opinion in State v. Trussell (No. 99,411) a murder-conspiracy case that reads like something from a TV show. In a unanimous decision, written by Justice Lee Johnson, the Court affirmed Jerry Trussell&#8217;s convictions arising out of the 1997 murder of his friend and host &#8220;Punkie&#8221; Harrod. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=405&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/decision-state-v-trussell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: State v. Case</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/decision-state-v-case/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/decision-state-v-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apprendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuss opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 7th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its decision in State v. Case (No. 98,077) a sex-offender sentencing appeal. In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Lawton Nuss, the Court vacated Christopher Case&#8217;s sentence for aggravated endangering of a child, finding that under the conditions of his guilty plea certain facts relied upon by [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=402&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/decision-state-v-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: State v. Easterling</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/decision-state-v-easterling/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/decision-state-v-easterling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica's Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 7th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its opinion in State v. Easterling (No. 100,454) a Jessica&#8217;s Law Sentencing Appeal. In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Lee Johnson, the Court upheld David Easterling&#8217;s sentence to life without parole for 25 years, for the molestation of his granddaughter. David Easterling sexually abused his 5 [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=400&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/decision-state-v-easterling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commentary: Has the Kansas Supreme Court quietly hobbled Jessica&#8217;s Law?</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/commentary-has-the-kansas-supreme-court-quietly-hobbled-jessicas-law/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/commentary-has-the-kansas-supreme-court-quietly-hobbled-jessicas-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apprendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica's Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 2nd 2009, the Kansas Supreme Court handed down State v. Bello, in which it ruled that Juan Jose Bello&#8217;s life without parole for 25 years sentence under Jessica&#8217;s Law was invalid because his age had not been presented to the Jury to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The relevant part of Jessica&#8217;s [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=397&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/commentary-has-the-kansas-supreme-court-quietly-hobbled-jessicas-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decision: State v. Morningstar</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/decision-state-v-morningstar/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/decision-state-v-morningstar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apprendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biles opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions_August_2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica's Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 14th. The Kansas Supreme Court has issued its decision in State v. Morningstar (No. 99,788) an appeal arising from a child abuse prosecution. In a unanimous opinion, written by Justice Dan Biles, the Court upheld the conviction of Gary Morningstar for the rape of his six-month old daughter but vacated his Jessica&#8217;s Law sentence, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=395&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/decision-state-v-morningstar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Write-ups pending</title>
		<link>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/write-ups-pending/</link>
		<comments>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/write-ups-pending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kscblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kscblog.wordpress.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 16th. We still have two decisions from August 7th to cover, but due to the wider impact of some recent Jessica&#8217;s Law cases and the August 14th decision in State v. Morningstar we will be covering that case first.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=kscblog.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5865459&amp;post=393&amp;subd=kscblog&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kscblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/write-ups-pending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">kscblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
